[ G. R. No. 39386. May 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39386. May 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39386
[ G. R. No. 39386. May 28, 1934 ]
EMILIO AGUINALDO, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________11th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that ______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx__ recover from xx______xx______xx______xx______xx the sum of Pxx______xx, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 5687. February 18, 1911 ](G.R. No. 5687)
- [ G.R. No. 15569. May 30, 1961 ](G.R. No. 15569)
- G.R. No. 96092, August 17, 1999
- G.R. No. 190067, March 09, 2010
- [ G.R. No. 117733. September 05, 1997 ](344 Phil. 288)
- [ G.R. No. 202838. September 17, 2014 ](743 Phil. 396)
- [ G.R. No. L-13204. March 20, 1959 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-15865. October 30, 1961 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.