CTA Case No. 759 (Decision)
!.- - - - - in - �7 � � - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - � � � � 1 � 1 u n f 146
--- � 1 � � - f � t ... � � - � 1 ,. 147 -
� -3 1� ... n � 1 e 1 c of �c 11 � ........... ----- ... .....fl.ill.io.............., - ----- - ................. .. ------... ............ __ _____..__--_-_-_- - - y+ ,,
-. � 1 � f - � v - . .~ x. e - � ( ... i v- -
� - - � � � �� 1 � 0 0 f � � � s1 cl ic � ,.
.. \ .� 7 - i )0 u O� � �� .... - 3 � 1 c eou & ' ,.
�7 - 7 .. � ... � n ( i J.e .. /, � 1� � ne nvo b () � - � on le 1 � ... i� l s 1c I' 152
-� 7 -- n r c -� r t. !' l f - c 0. � a n. J ct f� t � 1. 1 s � �J ~7 . 153
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 2162 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2162)
- DOLE PHILIPPINES, INC. - STANFILCO DIVISION v. THE SANGGUNIANG PANLUNGSOD OF THE CITY OF DAVAO, and the Hon. Sara Z. Duterte-Carpio and Bella Linda N. Tanjili, in their respective capacities as Mayor and Treasurer of the City of Davao(CTA Case No. EB 2461)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. EB 1688)
- STAR PERFORMANCE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6237)
- DE LA SALLE LIPA, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8363)
- CTA Case No. 4409 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4409)
- TOLEDO POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11109)
- UNITED OVERSEAS BANK PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7191)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.