[ G. R. No. 40618. August 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40618. August 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40618
[ G. R. No. 40618. August 28, 1934 ]
ROSARIO G. DE BARO ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. TOMAS A. WALLACE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________11th________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Palawan________, dated the _________26th__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, the costs of this instance to be paid by the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________ the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 204105, October 14, 2015
- [ G.R. No. L-28734. March 28, 1969 ](137 Phil. 371)
- G.R. NO. 126297, January 31, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 182426. February 13, 2009 ](598 Phil. 952; 106 OG No. 1, 21 (January 4, 2010))
- G.R. NO. 150194, March 06, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 175289. August 31, 2011 ](672 Phil. 155)
- [ G. R. No. 18034. December 08, 1921 ]
- [ G.R. No. 158270. July 21, 2008 ](581 Phil. 77)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.