CTA Case No. 1930 (Decision)
't~ 'UMLIC OF THE PHILIPPINFJI COURT OF TAX A:PPEA.L& QUEZON CITY - -� �1 ... - ... - - - - ... l� 0 t 1 , � � ' () t �398
t . 93 l 11 C ) c ot tlt r ()e 0 at ly, � he Coll 1nJ.� r 1ve .. th 1 �� � 1 c) .. c "an r Cu t � c' ' ; 10 ln th e �ntime, i,.ioner w1 a ltt t . hiptn f <!!1 ( ) n � b .rn~ r~d c1 on ti eo � o o 1 th ~vrr 1 .......,,.,._._l � ~ . h lt 19 � n '3 ~ , 1 , tb ta �t ,ti �ut ll .. 1 o b r olv 1n � hi �e . l..a " 1 f 00 00 1 0 1� He� '1 l� B. t!o 1 ~ and 5~1 o�f th T'aritt n t s- t C t U!>O hlc i t1o:n o �t tiD
m a c 't' o 4\1 ~hall tn no ca �..n ~ ol1, n <! tJr �l �4t'.l"'~ nf" Gr f>ntr;,r of tb .ssolt e~c �pt by e~ � etna of mtmd... t1\Pni' bjr tit~ "a ~t .r,. con !en~ C<:f D.. ~.ent thelile9f nnder oat h1l:..ar'D!2.&df:ttt!a~c~ h d ' to th e onr nt . nf.�. stt :t1lat , t:e.r tb tnvoi . &..i~Jd/or entttJ ~t-,1)1!, en 1 por.tat!OB have Oel!ttl 1"4� e$i'O'e4 ana reco.rae :U~ t'be off't.e ot . h~ � t-td ~e,, no .endv.ent ~f the _� � ifeet sh 11 be allowed� exc�pt .en t t ' �� oJ:IY1ot) that ~ �Ol~:ri ~l enor or enr otll$� � ,~Jor�pancy baa� bG � n eomtllttted ln the pr�p!U'; tion o:r tb~ ltl�!l fpst, lit-. th�ont � nv ts-audulen 1n .ent, d11J(!OV tr'l or � t coul n t b i"f'* b~ n t~ !J:p t f!ti 1 . tt r exf.tll11n&t1�en or th �1 p l"tat1o . bat bt11 � ;Q eompl~tett .._. 400
/ \. 1 0 t\ 1 rr $ 1. <',0 f on ;a w n 401
cVl!ClcSlIDll o. 9 I t I t tt ry � ~ () - t \ ...,.. 'to Ii C-od �� of l t r 1t \1 11 � 1. rovi- ions. (Zle i �� l � �� c � � 11 ) t 1, lUll 2, "9. ) 402
' .~ 0!"'~! J,f.j - r..A � ~ *� 19 .h 1h e io � . 1t 0 0 � 0� � v1 l th ' o � 4 � \ut .) t � "lf ct 0�
7 0 ... 1 v 1 .( c t 1 t �y n1
.� � 13 t g t 1 408
�1 pv.,..,..�""- f th t ne!'� .inet f 408
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BETHLEHEM HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2584)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BASF PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2754)
- ATR KIM ENG FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5722)
- HR MALL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9981)
- CTA Case No. 579 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 579)
- MINDANAO SANITARIUM AND HOSPITAL INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9783)
- CTA Case No. 6 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6)
- CTA Case No. 2141 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2141)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.