CTA Case No. 2524 (Decision)
f; f' l IC C" . (.,OL R'l ', �'�'" . L .l!j.~Lcl QLic.ZON LlT:l 0 .'."."' t Q(.I�U. ' � ~a... :. i�''-" .~.....~.V ci l. � f �feot1 by ,,et1 t1t10ll ..1 .-~ Cn rc, " ' 1973, ':! t ... 1on~r fl!!.Ot~i.\-~c t!" dP.r.i.:.ion of th\'11 C y Ho I'd of A~~~-es::r:t?~:-t A-r,�;-A� 1. r ,.ll c:l.n �:l' t1c t ~ffra tive 1971. He. .. " .. !� 2 69
with t to t lt p 1 :1 en �pril ~ , 197) . ~~ p~nd~nt nvo ~ ion t ~ h t: (2) n.g .at"tt~� ndo th . pe tl tio�. r 1 C ir~rt 1 th~ nrf"'!S . , - Pi t:~r 1 w. 1:1 r his � th.� or 1. . c~ti f J �.d th n�-t ~.,.e~~ �f<:r t~~ sa p I"! t ., ,....:r � . 1t "'t'tt,:! th. r d .,_,._. 1r1� r;:rr :n _n l,;.t>11 1'l , it i o:r r d~ no. r iV~ not CA ' 1Cl 1 t ;:t ~ rr� J:; id in ~a eou~e hf h""""'' ft lcoo 1 'a.n:tla (Jr -u =:.on G:lty w:'Lt�;. flt L forcti. g the city I:H,::J"" o o:r : is !"'(!V dr es � 1 t a y ru �~ 1 it 1 li :,..r:l noipla of' :� 27 0
- 3 n ..t. or e c � ft �. ~.:; .'l ..... tn( .us , r.. ~t-? R ,mt.li... ,o I ' r of h� .., y l! .. , t ~lobu j l.,ll~�!_j t. ..: .. t l t. ~' .. r ' .a. ~1 // :..� s t� ts.t J 18 .nu.~~n v ..1.1 t l ' .l ax- 1I 0\1 .... r .. ,:rlt � ~ ti 1� i:... r. �' 271
- �.; ...~ iJ " J.' l ; ....,..;.; ,... ll.t t !.$ t J r-t tl ~ 'J r;~ ' !1 1:.� t. ~ t , ��nco.. "!ltr:.' :~�, !t ... .. 11c o~ ... y t3 , � .. ll i}. � .u.. t) c :"it ... . 1 '7 .,~ .. ,... I� 4J � c1 1.1 ... . .... -'., ;' 27 2
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.