CTA Case No. 2524 (Decision)
f; f' l IC C" . (.,OL R'l ', �'�'" . L .l!j.~Lcl QLic.ZON LlT:l 0 .'."."' t Q(.I�U. ' � ~a... :. i�''-" .~.....~.V ci l. � f �feot1 by ,,et1 t1t10ll ..1 .-~ Cn rc, " ' 1973, ':! t ... 1on~r fl!!.Ot~i.\-~c t!" dP.r.i.:.ion of th\'11 C y Ho I'd of A~~~-es::r:t?~:-t A-r,�;-A� 1. r ,.ll c:l.n �:l' t1c t ~ffra tive 1971. He. .. " .. !� 2 69
with t to t lt p 1 :1 en �pril ~ , 197) . ~~ p~nd~nt nvo ~ ion t ~ h t: (2) n.g .at"tt~� ndo th . pe tl tio�. r 1 C ir~rt 1 th~ nrf"'!S . , - Pi t:~r 1 w. 1:1 r his � th.� or 1. . c~ti f J �.d th n�-t ~.,.e~~ �f<:r t~~ sa p I"! t ., ,....:r � . 1t "'t'tt,:! th. r d .,_,._. 1r1� r;:rr :n _n l,;.t>11 1'l , it i o:r r d~ no. r iV~ not CA ' 1Cl 1 t ;:t ~ rr� J:; id in ~a eou~e hf h""""'' ft lcoo 1 'a.n:tla (Jr -u =:.on G:lty w:'Lt�;. flt L forcti. g the city I:H,::J"" o o:r : is !"'(!V dr es � 1 t a y ru �~ 1 it 1 li :,..r:l noipla of' :� 27 0
- 3 n ..t. or e c � ft �. ~.:; .'l ..... tn( .us , r.. ~t-? R ,mt.li... ,o I ' r of h� .., y l! .. , t ~lobu j l.,ll~�!_j t. ..: .. t l t. ~' .. r ' .a. ~1 // :..� s t� ts.t J 18 .nu.~~n v ..1.1 t l ' .l ax- 1I 0\1 .... r .. ,:rlt � ~ ti 1� i:... r. �' 271
- �.; ...~ iJ " J.' l ; ....,..;.; ,... ll.t t !.$ t J r-t tl ~ 'J r;~ ' !1 1:.� t. ~ t , ��nco.. "!ltr:.' :~�, !t ... .. 11c o~ ... y t3 , � .. ll i}. � .u.. t) c :"it ... . 1 '7 .,~ .. ,... I� 4J � c1 1.1 ... . .... -'., ;' 27 2
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 790 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 790)
- NORTHWIND POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1132)
- MAERSK GLOBAL SERVICES CENTRES (PHILIPPINES) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9015)
- NIPPON EXPRESS (PHILIPPINES) CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7189)
- CTA Case No. 1565 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1565)
- ALEXANDER C. CRISOSTOMO, as sole proprietor of BIOCARE HEALTH RESOURCES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE through OIC REGIONAL DIRECTOR JONAS AMORA(CTA Case No. 8672)
- CTA Case No. 467 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 467)
- CTA Case No. 2740 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2740)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.