CTA Case No. 1858 (Decision)

c ;-� � 'f,' .I ' OF TIH. PHl L li' U ~ COURT OF TL'~.. APPEALS QUe:60N CITY J 10 � 1 0 10 cr r 1 d ;, ' 1 .? 102

� ll v ls 1 t cf- D� 103

\ 1 fl 1 t1o Y' . it~, 6 0 .. 01') ' s � '). nd - i 1 _ttlf!ir � 'nt d n, 1 9~ t it :ls i r Oll , T.tt _ 1B, t~6 respo e t v1 n ""'t � a-e o u lt � 1�, 1967 rei � , Pf( iti tn ,:r ins nt p �tttton fo.r ::r vie~ � 0 Ju , 5, ?'. �y � to ov thf 1 1M r r to e:r ' 1 n 1 ta s t- tl" t ar 95'81 1 5'9 .lf 1 0' '-1i~:

�1 . i' 10 .5

~~ 10 6

- ... . !). t ~~,, 1 e a 5. \II ls . t ~, � co� t t 't'J 1~ )') � ~.t j .. .,.'s d � ne 0 � .,. c 191 of I ~j,l � � ~ fi �� .;, ('! ,. j OQ , i ' !l ou a<'~ 19f a :t..,. !' r c fl \' .�_.- '. 107

1 & .t1;tn ro'1t 1... �~ 1 .). t � j' ---- \ ��-� - j; 10 8

.c::: 1) t p1 l. (. . ) t t iil�.l.. t t .. -Oll 1 e 1 09 j: I

�� , 110

I \ I ;. " 1.11

�15 11 1i .~ . c; 1 ct ro - ii. t ~ l" tf ; 1 i �1 1' '�"")"

. ... , ' s et � � iti oa1tt � - � � 1 v u �crt c Co. � -o. -�� or i' 113

1 1 � �t - � X

1 1 1' 1 3 - t ot �l a t e I' - ui � 1, � 'I' 1" th ll 1 n h 11 �) t t l In 1 t .!ou - I 115

f.' 1' ' 116

16 r1/ ' ,\� 117

0: c ... 1'7 ,. 11.. 8

1 5� � � � � ;. 119