ROSITA A. YABES v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE REVENUE REGION NO. 18 AND ROZIL R. LOZARES, IN HIS CAPACITY AS REGIONAL DIRECTOR
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City SECOND DIVISION ROSITA A. YABES, CTA Case No. 8406 Petitioner, Members : -versus- CASTANEDA, Chairperson; CASANOVA, and BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, MINDARO-GRULLA, JJ,. REVENUE REGION NO. 18 and ROZIL R. LOZARES, in his capacity as Promulgated: Regional Director, OCT Z 5 ~ <t::zo/'- Respondents. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X RESOLUTION When this case was called for Pre-Trial Conference, only counsels for the respondents, Atty. Felix Paul Velasco III and Atty. Sherry Anne C. Gabriel appeared. Counsel for the petitioner, Atty. Arlyn Joy C. Allosa-Alaba, failed to appear despite notice. Considering that this is the second time the Pre-Trial was reset despite due notice to petitioner's counsel, Atty. Velasco moved that the instant case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court granted the said motion. Accordingly, the above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED . SO ORDERED. 9. c. ax-~~ Q JUA<NITO C. CASTANED~tfR: Associate Justice ~ QdJ; N.I\A ~ . G~ CAESAR A. CASANOVA CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1990 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1990)
- ASC INVESTORS, INC. v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his capacity as the City Treasurer of Davao City(CTA Case No. EB 1568)
- EGIS ROAD OPERATION S.A. v. THE SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND COMM. INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8414)
- CTA Case No. 1058 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1058)
- ROBERT CHRISTOPHER M. CARMONA, doing business under the name SAGA CASTING AND PRODUCTIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8484)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOLDXTREME TRADING CO.(CTA Case No. EB 2751)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ARTURO E. VILLANUEVA(CTA Case No. EB 1771)
- DIAGEO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 902)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.