CTA Case No. 1994 (Resolution)
,\t'.l"litsl.IC OF TB.E PHILIPI"lNI<.:l' COURT OF TAX APPEAU EZON CITY . : - CIAL P . ~IC� 0Cu , A n , ~~ 0 lG/ ~/l'.T etitio.r:_er , v �- � � \J U..i.....J l., � - versus - X- - - - - - - - - - - A 1 .c.: 8 Conrir~:~L the verbal oraer ~iven in open court , for t~1e reason tiat re ~onaent !1as already credl -ced to ttle _)et:i_tio~ler tue a_,CJu.nt ,1erein s ou~:,nt to be refu__ued , a11d for lac.:.-: of ooJectior: or.. �c.1e �'art or' opyosir:.6 counsel , petitioner 1 s .ulOtJ..Oll to ai s1...is s lS t ere by G~ .. _.'l.L:D . uezon ity , Lay u , 197 . ~ 1 1 . J. V.A..vi.1.A s sociate JLAdf:,e
More in CTA Resolutions
- STEFANINI PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10188)
- LIBERTY FLOUR MILLS INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9603)
- ACCENTURE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7577)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. OCEANAGOLD (PHILIPPINES), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2721)
- CTA Case No. 5373 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5373)
- CTA Case No. O-14 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. O-14)
- CTA Case No. 1258 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1258)
- EMPIRE AUTOMATION PHILS INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10924)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.