jurisprudence[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ] 1934-03-10

[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]

[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]

G. R.. No. 35798

[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]

ARTEMIO DE LOS SANTOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT VS. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that _________the appellee___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.