CTA Case No. 87 (Decision)
----- � tt � ... � � � li �o1 � -- - . - - .. � X u . f' :"J t1t � o. e 1.s c iz r, , d � u 1 th r e � �n th f lc 1. t h t 0.. � \Jc r .- to "l _p . ec . ) n i l ,� h o iC "3 of t. .. u:r o in �t e y .r l ~ r so rc � ol]o ;. Tota l f- h �������� �������������� � ot 1 d a c: s i co ���������������������� rot cJl ����������������� 11 c .) n r . 1. y � ti.on ~ r, "'1 n. .nt ~ l c.h' r.t nr 0 nt th �) . I 1j ho y 1� ' '",1: ,. l d d j t - .J dy 0 de ,.c t 0 li elp arrascos JJn t p titl.o � � � of 0 297
l � ... 9 Gf t . 1 . nc t f � �� c� c OllS vt t ~ � c 1 :r c ~ c t ng s .. 0 0 ( � A� t � " . t � d)(. 1 t 0 1 � (c .) � y t .............. . ���� � ������������ � o� n- r ty �� �� � � � � � � � � �; �J�t� � 0 �"�l � � �� �� 0 �������������������������� � (I .r. t Ct"'. ) I t llo c 0 t. 0 V' .n 0 .. 1 JC t n t <) ~�n f r-77. d 1c1 cy 1 c fo �x 298
-.u l - -- 1� v0 ( :3r. 7, f .ct~ . ) 0 ~n c n� XX 0 i t on 0 .. o 1 f r -0 () n t .t; - ,� n� . X X () t - cr c - . UIA ca x J � r b t 0 � c .ll ~ y r"' . � t, . . .. 299
""'�'� � \oo ' � ' - no t0 t th r d :cs. nd s�t n c t th � :r: V" � Q1 n- t �L1 7� 1 ... � 1 *:' >]t!.~ f. m �- no . 1en t 01 0 .� � t� c xe � cc le y tr op n'\ c n �( n� ot 1nc nt. , � t "' h � 7 , � ". , 0 fro t 0 ct I c� (. � t �� t .n 1:' n t t tt lt (c)(~ ( 3 X � � X ) X 300
1 5 ._ c c .. ... 1 n � 1 (; ( .co � r oou e .. �� c t x. � 301 ,.
� ... 6 .. i G tj .71 ly t � h ol ... - lo t t 0 :r- 's 0 il co. i i t :r: t l yr~� u. -� t-x ���������������� 7. 7l J ut . 1 �������������������� . or ov s t > ~ ..I; ( ~) � !',}() t t y <) )( r� 7 �p � � c. t 1: �th � o itio~d." t~ ~ �t nd/ p 0 ,.., llf �{ f ct � or h i .. .:.:� � n rso 0 nro r ���� ~') . _,h ct re t t 1 ,) t � t 0 t � 302
� 7- � tpt yll l o- X t to... 1 t c y ;r , on � 0 X . t t0' � ... e ' n �� r � , 1 to L- � "' .) � l- �' 0 tl ' I)~ 1 tt � X t d c: c X r ct ro 1 0h nt f t ot l rx .y nly cf h ( � co X on , � � 7, � � � n c un nt n tX t 1 f ' 0� t ~ r � n � 1 t. � t .od rt f rt s t 1 t nt r l or � ' 303
. - c, . � D"",-..Iv ...., ;,).!... ' I . .l � � 8- () t 0 gj 0 nt Y� �t e �i t L l l Ir~ - va .� �o � .'.. . P � ?7 ~ 1" - # J.J �-t 'J. 1 ,E) y t�. 't 1. t: ~,.� (l " i t 0 . 1i (!s:..ry . (cu., ,;J .ot y t :. t t0 t t l r �Ct~A~l l 0 t th n t. . 0 v 1 ia . t: - e p rr r t L. . � 0 3 t tc 1 ....1cr f .1,0. () I 0 "' . l ������ ��� ���� c t; � �� �� �� �� �� � � � on .1 ������� � � � �� �� ����� � ���� � �� ���� ������ ����� � ���� � ����� ������ ��-� � . . t .. � ��� � ���� ����� ����� � ���� ����������� ��� 304
� 305
More in CTA Decisions
- BPI CAPITAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5457)
- CALAMBA PREMIER REALTY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2312)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-99 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-99)
- NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES (NGCP) v. OFELIA M. OLIVA, IN HER CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF CEBU CITY(CTA Case No. EB 849)
- CTA Case No. 391 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 391)
- HC CONSUMER FINANCE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10757)
- JUMBO EAST REALTY INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1322)
- FORT BONIFACIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10344)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.