cta_decision CTA Case No. 42144214 1994-07-19

CTA Case No. 4214 (Decision)

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY BANK OF THE PH I LIPPINE ISLANDS, Petitioner�, - vet�s u s - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4214 COMMIS S IONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, He s pondent . - �- �- - -� �. X DECISION S ui t b r� ought by petitioner Bank of Philippine Islands (BPI) i s a c laim for r ef und of a n alleged ove r� p a id c r e di table ~-.~ithholding taxes of Family Ba nk a nd Tru s t Company (FBTC) i n the a mo unt of P174,065.77 for t h e six mo n t h pe r� i o d , Ja n u a r� y to June 19 8 5 . Th e right to pur s u e the claim arose when petitioner became t h e s u ccesso r�- in - inter� est of FBTC by virtue of a n Arti c l es of Merger duly ap pro ve d by the Sec urit y a nd Exchange Commi ss ion on July 1, 1 985 (E x h . "D"). Dur� 'lng t h e six month period e nded June 3 0, 1985, FBTC r eceived rental income from l eas ing offi ce spaces a nd int e re st income fr�o m treasury note s pur c ha se d from Ce n tra l Bank . On t h ese income, petitioner a ll e g e d that a 565

DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4214 - 2- 5% creditable withholding ta x was dedu cte d by vario u s l essees a nd a 15% wi t hh oldi ng tax by the Cent r al Bank. Petitioner further alleged t hat FBTC at the e nd of it s corporate existe nce on June 3 0, 19 85 filed its final income ta>< t- eturn wit h the Bureau of Internal Reve nu e on April 10, 1986 s h owing a net l oss of P6 4, 502 ,93 5. 00 and a r ef und able a mou n t of P1 74,065.77, represe n ting cre ditable income tax withheld at so ur ce for the period January to June 1985 (Exh. � "A") . On October 1 7 , 1986, p e titioner filed a letter claim for refund dated October 10, 1986 with respondent's Chi e f Appellate Divisio n a s ki ng for t h e r� ef und of P1 7 4,065 . 77 (E x h . cII II ) � Since respondent h as not acted on the matter, petitioner on Dece mb e r 29, 198 7 filed the insta nt case. Hence, thi s petition for review. Responde nt in h is a n swer a nd by way of s pe cial d e fen ses , a ll eges among others, t h at: a . petitioner ' s right to claim the refund / tax c r e d i t )1 a d a 1 t' e a d y p r e s c r i b e d ; b . it is incumbent upon petitioner to s ho w that it h as complied \.Jith t h e provi s ion of Sec. 292 of t h e Tax Code; and c . clai ms for� r�e fund are construed s trictly against c laimant s s inc e a c l ai m fot- r�e fund p artakes t h e nat u re of tax exe mption . 566

DECI S ION - C.T.A. CA SE NO . 4 21 4 - 3- The is s ues to be r esolved, b y this Court, are: 1 . Wh et h er or n ot the petition for�. review is barred by p rescriptio n ; a nd 2. Wh et h er or not petitioner i s entitled to the refund of P174,065.66. An e nt t h e first issue, the pro vis ioh of the law is very clear o n t h e matter. � I n fact, it i s a well settle d r- ul e that a clai m for r e fund of a tax alleged to have been erroneo u sly o r illegally co ll ecte d mu st be filed wit h th e Com missio n er of Internal Reve nu e wit hin two years from the date of pay ment of t h e tax and no s uit or pr ocee ding for refund s hall be begun after t h e expirati on of th e t\-Jo - year period. Thi s i s provided und er Sectio n 292 of t h e National Int e rnal Reve nu e Code, as amended, which r� ea d s: Sec. 292. Recovery of tax erroneously or illegally collected . No s uit or proceeding s llal.l be maintain e d in a ny co ur t for t h e reco v ery of any national internal re ve nue ta x h e r e a f t e r a 11 e g e d to h a v e b e e n e r r .o n e o u s 1 y o r i ll egally col lected , or of a ny p e nalty c laimed to h av e been col l ected witho ut aut hority, or of any s um allege d to h ave been excessive or i n a n y ma n n e r� wr o n g f u 11 y c o 11 e c t e d , u n t i 1 a c 1 a i rn for� ref und or cre d it h a s been duly filed with t h e Co mmi s s io n e r� ; but s u c h s uit o r� pr�ocee ding may be maintained, whether or n ot s uch tax, penalty, or s um h as been paid und er prot est or durf~ss. I n a n y c a s e , n,-'o"--....=s;..:u:;:...;c::..:...:h_...:::s:...:u:=-=.i....::t=---'o::....;..r_.s::;p...:.r�_o=-=c....::e:c..e=d-=-=i:...n:..:...::~.q s h all b e b e gun after the expirat i ~ n of two year s f r� om the d ate of payme n t of the tax or pen a lty regardle ss of any s up e r vening ca u se 567

DECISION - C .T. A. CASE NO. 4214 - 4- t h at 1na y a ri se a ft e r pa ym e n t; P rovi d e d, h ow eve 1� , t h at t h e Co mm i ss ion e r may, e v en wi t h o u t a wr�it t e n c l a i m th ere f or , re fund or c r e dit a n y t a x , wh e re o n f ace o f th e re turn u pon wh i c h p a ym e n t wa s ma,d e , s u c h p a ym e nt a pp ea t�s c l ear ly to h ave b ee n e rroneou s ly paid. (Und e rl i ning s uppli e d) . Re s p ond e n t con t e n d s t h a t t h e in s t a nt case i s barred b y pre sc riptio n . For t h e a ll e ge d a mo unt o f ta x wi thheld and paid wa s for t h e fi sc a l y ea r e nding Jun e 3 0, 1985. Th e p e titi o n fo I' I'BV i et..J wa s fi l e d wi t h t h is Co u r t only Dec e mb e r 2 9 ' 1 987, wh ic h i s c l ea rl y b e yond th e two ye a r period a ll o we d by law. Befo 1�e t hi s CO UI' t ca n rul e o n tt1 e i ss u e of p re s cr ip tion, it i s no tewo r t h y to p o int ou t that base d on t h e fin a n cial s tate me n t s o f FBT C a nd th e independent a ud itor ' s o p inio n ( Ex h s. " A- 7 " to "A - 17") , FBTC o p e r at es o n a ca l e nd ar year ba s i s . Its twel ve ( 1 2 ) months acc ounting p erio d wa s s h orte n ed at t he tim e it was me rged wi th BP I . T h ere b y, losi n g it s c o r po1�ate exi s te nc e on � J uly 1 , 1 985 wh e n t h e Articl es of Mer g e r wa s ap p roved by t h e Sec u rity a nd Ex c h a n g e Co mm i s s i o n . Th u s , re s pond e nt stand t h a t FBT C op e r a t es on a fi s ca l year b as i s , b a s ed o n i t s in co ~ e t ax ret urn, h o ld s no ground. Thi s Cour- t b e l i e v es t h at FBTC i s operati n g o n a ca l e nd ar yea r p e riod b ase d on t h e a udite d ' fina n c ial s ta t e me nt s a nd t t�1e opin i on th e r eo f. T h e fi sca l p e 1� iod e n di ng J un e 3 0, 1 985 o n the upp e r left c or n e r� of t h e in c om e tax re turn c an be 568

- DECISION C.T . A. CASE NO. 4 2 14 5- co nclud e d as a n e rt� ot" o n th e part of FBTC. It s hould h ave be e n for t h e s i x mo nth p er iod end ing J u ne 30 , 1985 . It s h o uld a l s o be e mph asized that " where one corporati on s u cceeds another b oth a r e se p arate e ntiti es an d t h e in c ome ea rn e d by th e p rece de cess or co rpor atio n b ef ore organization o f it s s u ccessor is not i n co me to t he s u ccessor " (M e rten s , Law of F e deral Income T a xa tion, Vol. 7 s 38.36 ) . Rul i ng now o n t h e issue of pr escriptio n, t hi s Court find s t h at t h e petitio n for r ev i e w i s fil e d out of time. FBTC, a ft e r t l1 e e nd of its cor porate life on June 3 0, 1985, s h o uld h ave fil e d it s inco me tax r et urn wit h in t h irty d ays after t h e cessa tio n of it s bu s ine ss or thirty day s after the a ppro va l o f t h e Article s of Merg er. This is bol ste r ed by Sec. 78 of t h e Tax Code a nd und er Sec. 2 44 of Reve nu e Re gulation s No. 2 . P ertine nt provisions of sai d l aws a re hereby quoted as: Sec. 78. Return of corporation contemplating dissolution . Ever y cor por atio n �:> h cll l , wi t 11 in thirty d.E._Y s af ter t h e adoptio n by t h e c o t" p o r a t i o n o f a ,. e s o 1 u t i o n o r ~ f o r t h e di sso lution of th e corporatio n or for t h e l..i.9..hLi d at ion of the who 1 e or a ny part of i t s ca pi ta l stock , rend er a co rr ec t retur n to the Cornmi_ss i o n er of Internal Revenue, veri fie d u n d e r o a t 11 , s e t t i n g f o ,. t h t h e t e r m s o f s u c h re s olution or plan a nd s u c h other infonnatio n as th e Mini s t er of Finance s hall by r e gulati ons , p resc rib e. Sec. 24 4. Ret u r n of corporation c on te mpl ati ng di sso lution or retiring from 56 9

-- DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO . 4 2 14 - 6- b u s j 11 e s s . D..l.L.__�QI_P....9_ I' a .t.LQJJ..?.J._ _Q_S!J'_t.'l~.E-?.l:LL.J2...2.. J..Sl.J.r..U:,. . . . i~..~..<:::SL~U.Lt..2_____iLU..9__~l.?.3 u -~J u t i Q. n s , c o n t e rn p 1 a t i n g di sso luU.o rr , _�.ll�)._L_ wit ll in 3 0 d .e_y.2____a_f_~e 1� t h e JlP_� r� o v ~, 1 o f s u c 11 r e s o 1 u t i o n a u t h o r i Qrr.g_ t h e i r di sr-;o lution, a t1 d wit hin t h e sa me period after ..tb-~L_r� __.!.:..Q t 1.I...~..!!l.?J...Lt_�_..fL<:?..!.!l.___Q_u s i n e s s '� �f i J._g____!Jl.� i r l..D c..Q.!ll~:.._..l.f.l..~L.....!.::�.Q_t..!::U.J::L.....J::C..Q~:_..!:lJ.L9____j;_b_�.......12 r� o f i t e a I' n e d _....Q.L b u_!:? i ll�..�..L.9..QJ:l�..__j~_y_J;JJs m___f.L~...!I!.__ t ~'-!..e b e g..i n n in 9.......Q f t h e y_e a_r:____!::!f!___!;_Q___!;;_b.Q..___g a t_e_____Q..L........::"U:l c h dis s o l u t ion o t' L.~!::.i.L?..!!.!.Qll t __fl_~lY__p_:J.L...J:J:u~__g_ o r r....�.2..P.....QI!_d i 11 g i n c o me t a x du e _lli~~Q..!.L_.~JLO_r_r --~.:!.�J1.!.9..!..L<i.....I2.L.J;.ll e Co rnm i s? ion e 1� o t 1J.!J;_�':..L.!.l9....l.. . He v_g_r ru e . x >< >< � ( lJ rr d e t' s c o r� i 11 g s up p 1 i e d ) Ba se d 0 11 t h e r�eco rd, f" BTC fil e d i t s income tax 1� e t u r� n o 11 Ap r i 1 1 0 , 1 9 8 6 wh e r e a s t h e 1 a \-J p r o v i d e s t h a t t h e sa rn e s h o uld b e fil e d '.Ji.t: hin t hi r� ty day s after t h e a IJ p 1� ova J of t h e 1'1 r tic 1 e s of ~1 e ,. g e r� or f r� o 111 J u 1 y 2 , 19 8 5 to July :J J, 1985. And t ir e c l ai m fo r� r�e fur1d s h o uld b e fil e d with :l 11 t ',-JO ye a r '('~ f r� o rn t h e dat e of p ay me nt of t h e lax o r� f 1� u rn J u 1 y 3 1 , 1 9 8 5 to J u 1 y 3 0 , 1 9 8 7 p u 1� s ua n t to r SE)C. 292 () t h e 1 a>< CodG' i.l S tl ll! G tld e d .. Howe\/ fl t' , thi s case wa s filed on De ce mb er 29, 1987 w11i c !1 i. s 1 5 2 d a y s .l a t: e 1 r� o rn J u 1 y 3 0 , 1 9 8 7 , t h e 1 a s t d a y a ll ov.,�P d by l aw �r- o r- p e ti.t:io n e r� to �fil e judi cial c laim for T h fJ 1� c f o ( e ; r� e s p o n d e n t ' s c o n t e n t .i o n t h a t t h e p e t i t 1 o n i s barr e d b y pr esc ription i s h ere by uph e ld . No t on g1� ound tl 1n t: 1-BTC .i. s o n fi sca l p er iod rath e r FB TC cease d to oper�a t c .:~~~a jur � id .Lc: a l p e 1�so t1 o n July 1, 1 985. r I n \1 i C! ~-.' 0 f () l.ll' i n d i. I I g I. h u t t II e p e r i 0 d t 0 f i l e t h e r c l.:llill r 0 , . I (0 ll n d II d '~ 5. i l d p e d !) r e c~ c ,. i be d ' t h e qu es t i 0 n 0 f 570

- �-- DECI SIO N - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4214 - 7- w11 e t h e r o t� n o t p e t i t i o n e ,. i s e n t i t 1 e d t o t h e r e f u n d o f t h e a mo unt of P1 74,065 .6 6 becomes mo ot a nd aca d e mi c. WH EREFORE , finding t h e p etitio n for review without me rit, th e case is o rs r~I SS ED a nd t h e refund so ught: i s h e t�e by DENIED . Wit h cos t s against p e tition er . SO ORDERED. Qu ez on City, Met ro Ma nil a, J uly 19, 1994. ~Q .. ~ ERNESTO D. ACO S TA Presiding Judg e WE CO NCUR : ' t..i.~~~ A sso c i 0. e DJE u~U'M at 571

- w ........... DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO . 4 2 14 -8 CE RT I F I C AT I 0 N I h ereby certify t h a t t h e d ec i si on was r ea ch e d afte r du e co n s ul tat i o n a mo n g t h e rn e rnb e r s of th e Co ur t of Tax App ea l s in acco rd a n ce with Sec tion 1 3 , Arti c l e VIII of t h e Con s t itutio n . ~Q.~ ' � ERNESTO 0. ACOSTA Presiding Judge Court of Tax Appeals 572

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.