CTA Case No. 815 (Resolution)
' ... - . ' 11\EPUBUC OJ' TilE PHILIP PI " 4 eou.aT OF TAX AP K\ L �, ~li CITY I � ~- -� > LA ROYALE l''""LGE , .: Petitioner , - versus - C. T. A. CASE NO . 81 5 CO_ffiSS IO:~ R OF I NTER1:AL REVEf'-'UE , Respondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - X RE S0 LUT I 0 N .Pe titione r pre sente d a _no tion wi t hdra-vri n g i t s " e ti t ion fo r Re view" on the ground t llat the ca s e h as been sett led to the sa t i sf action of t he parti es and i t appear�l ng t hat the said motion is wi t h the confor mit y of .. espond en t and hi s attorn ey s , the said motion is her eby gr~nt ed . SO O~DERED . Quezon Ci t y , Decembe .'~" 10 , 1965 . sn .
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. SANOFI-AVENTIS PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2027)
- CTA Case No. 2878 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2878)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOHLE SHIPMANAGEMENT PHILS., CORP.,(CTA Case No. EB 1582)
- CTA Case No. 2373 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2373)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. G&W ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND PROJECT CONSULTANTS CO.,(CTA Case No. EB 1606)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VICTORIAS FOODS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1542)
- CTA Case No. 222 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 222)
- CTA Case No. 3598 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3598)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.