[ G. R. NO. 35938. May 14, 1934 ]
[ G. R. NO. 35938. May 14, 1934 ]
G. R. NO. 35938
[ G. R. NO. 35938. May 14, 1934 ]
MARIA PEREZ ET AL., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANTS, VS. MARCELANO PEREZ PAZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _____________the appellee__________ recover from the __________the appellants__________the sum of _________P40.00_________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 131591. December 29, 1999 ](378 Phil. 1267)
- [ G.R. No. 98427. November 20, 1992 ](290 Phil. 326)
- [ G.R. Nos. 136247 & 138330. November 22, 2000 ](399 Phil. 178)
- [ G.R. No. 552. November 17, 1902 ](G.R. No. 552)
- [ G.R. No. 194176. September 10, 2014 ](742 PHIL. 680)
- G.R. No. 164141, February 26, 2010
- G.R. No. 120027, April 21, 1999
- G.R. No. 160067, November 17, 2010
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.