cta_resolution CTA Case No. EB 1095EB 1095 2014-02-10

AJINOMOTO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY ENBANC AJINOMOTO PHILIPPINES CTA EB NO. 1095 CORPORATION, (CTA CASE NO. 7901) Petitioner, -versus- Present: Del Rosario, P.J., Castaneda, Bautista, Uy, Casanova, Pabon-Victorino, Mindaro-Grulla, Cotangco-Manalastas, Ringpis-Liban, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, Respondent. Promulgated: FEB 1 x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------x RESOLUTION On December 6, 2013, petitioner Ajinomoto Philippines Corporation filed a Motion for Additional Time to File Petition for Review, stating that it � received the Resolution of the Special First Division of this Court on November 21, 2013; that it has fifteen (15) days from receipt of the Resolution or until December 6, 2013 within which to file a Petition for Review; that the said Petition for Review cannot be finalized in time for filing on its due date since there is a need for additional research and further verification of records. Petitioner prayed that it be given until December 21, 2013 to file the Petition for Review.

RESOLUTION CTA EB NO. 1095 (CTA CASE NO. 7901) On December 10, 2013, the Court En Bane issued a Minute Resolution granting petitioner a final and� non-extendible period of fifteen (15) days or until December 21, 2013 to file its Petition for Review. On January 2, 2014, petitioner filed a Manifestation, stating that it has decided not to pursue its appeal and it will no longer file the Petition for Review. IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the Manifestation is hereby NOTED. Let this case be considered CLOSED AND TERMINATED. Presiding Justice \) _ C , CJI-~~ ~~� Associ te Justice JU~ITO C. CASTANEfSA, JR. CAESAR~ASANOVA Associate Justice Associate Justice ERLl~21~-ERA-UY Associate Justice (On Leave) CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice ~/~ ~#- AMELIA R. COTANGCO -MANAIASTAS Associate Justice ~ . ~ ~ L...' MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.