jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ] 1934-05-14

[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 38730

[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]

CANDELARIA SISON ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ULAM CRUZ ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________11th__________ day of _________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost in this instance against the appellants.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.