[ G. R. No. 35424. May 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 35424. May 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 35424
[ G. R. No. 35424. May 07, 1934 ]
LUCIO VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT CONTRA C1PRIAN0 DE TORRES ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _________the appellees___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 221370, June 28, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 51805. February 25, 1982 ](197 Phil. 933; 81 OG No. 6, 504 (February 11,1985))
- [ G.R. No. 34768. October 01, 1931 ](G.R. No. 34768)
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-99-1224. December 12, 2002 ](442 Phil. 236)
- [ G.R. No. L-49227. April 25, 1980 ](186 Phil. 67)
- [ G. R. No. L-5296. May 29, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 60368. September 11, 1982 ](202 Phil. 172; 80 OG No. 19, 2796 (May 7, 1984))
- [ G.R. No. L-33013. March 28, 1980 ](185 Phil. 424)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.