CTA Case No. 169 (Decision)
� r\W-'UtiLiC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF 1'AX APPEALS MANILA -- -- - . -. c .� !tion 336
-J- - � � () ) ..... t' � . ���'
t � �' '") ') 8 .) ._)
� .� 339
�1 fe f .. h � � 1 ,c -. � r � tr at G � ' � not t t ..,.... tp lst! "~"'� .. g 1 wh � � e xl J. t:r i f 6. � l � 15, 2., 7. 7 � 14. 17, � �� 16. 1 1 6. 67 ,7
� 1 � sl , ,. .".. [ 6� �"'l " �9v 2� ...... -�-� t9 . � ll,4W. �� l . � 50. � i 1� .oo rri 11, ..o. � � nzJ. 1� .oo � � .at i f � z. �r � � � l � .-- � -.-- ........ � 1 � � 1� l, 7u . � ... ..,
169 .. 7. � .oo � �� :t l i 1 c �n he - i i ... bl 1 oo. � i s~ y �1 � . '21' . 11 , 21 tl n .. icil n e~Vi p h la l0 I � tt . nd 1. . u ' , t sur r l � �T 0t h di.ree 1V � � g an � !_ . i~ r � i ti e 1 icd ov rt tint tt n r .e TV"t � t - 1 0 X t0 ~~ .. .; '
-- t e! � v .... ,...... "' 1 9 r .. � i 9t y i.t . :2 ~ ht 0 .... Q fo ' f r fl ii t�x � se '� ~2. � t � (i n. 17 2 r1 t� � ' t xa.ol u-; y ar � 0p 5i r of t .. i' 34 3 .. ~ .. .
34-1
1 � � � � 345
. � ,; 34 6
1e � � �] � � f 347
.I 348
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.