CTA Case No. 181 (Decision)
) UL r'l~'.J: !V T";: P HI L IP1 '1'1::.:. Cuu1U ' 0 ...'.u\. AJ!.t>EALS MANlL4 --- .. �� . - - - � � � 769
� , 770
� , 771
� 772
� � � 773
I� 774
.. � t I I� 775
� 776
I ' ' .. .. .. l .P ..hi y l � 777
-... , I I 778
"' ' . 1 ... 1 -- � th a
eD . _IS� IO � c"" E � � 1a1 1\ . n h &r':JO i 1an a-s.t , ho n by the followin p.rovi ion: J. � sior 1 ad � ith :re p c.t � o � nif��t � are , t here. or , of th op1n on at , the of the !ENt L" ati fy the n of t e l a\ . ID , TIOt' � r _ of th opint b t the f or� itur of t ele t i c r nge tio under ection l � 63(g) ia ill 9 1. , it !s hera y ordered that the atd re ea d t o th her i n petit i ner upon t dut l , t xe ilo , ov~. her 14, 19 6. 780
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.