CTA Case No. 3730 (Resolution)
JtEI'OBLIC 0 F fH'E PHlUPPlNf\ ~OURT OF TAX A.FP�Al...~ QUEZON C~T? THE CH ! 'rE ED BANK, C . � "' � C >.>E NO . 3730 P tit1oner. - versus X- - e pondent. .. .. - - - .. .. X E50LUriO cting on t1 "Motion .~.o ithdraw The P tition or vi w" fil d by ~itioner on e~ruary 11, 19 6 on the ground th t compro ise settlem nt has alr dy n r ch d by th above p rties as evi anced by a l tt r of the '"ctin L '11l"'i �i')n r oi nt�rnol ev nue dte ov hur beinJ no ooj ction on th part of re p n ot: I'h ourt r olve � pr y d for, to grant said motion. Let the titi n f r review be je med withdra n n thi ca d clos d nd t r in ted. oO � y, M tro ~ nil � l rch 17, 1986. ez n Pr s c UIN J"u g G.-;
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.