CTA Case No. 569 (Decision)
I ()It () . .� � .. . -- -�--�- -. --. - 1 � � �l. .) - c � 7 � 72 .) � (� 1 - � t - 439
- 12 - �1�� Af r o � or . 11 � th . t 1 0 �111 tn n f r .h ! . 11 � t. .) �� � f. 1 � .1 in ng e l nu f pl t 1 id h t d w1t 1. ying pr ta l 1' h kl � X>te.r t n� dr1 . M hod .. (Pa~. f 1 t~$.) ur .� n to .rom ust � 1956 t 31. 19 6, inC! 1 � p ti on r tt a 9~ e 1 � c prod�c� t t\ of 11. 1. 1 1eh h p d to th Tl"e$:& r of vao City , on 'I 1 � 1 7, t h��� y,. 1 '"' et 0 In, , n 1 1 ... 186 o"' � 161~. Th~ nd '�.!,,. b'f { pu llc .I!IJ:; �� th s; e a � f 1! 1�. l1 f ( �� � 440
e-1- � s.� . 'J � 1 � rt. � onc1�nt a Ql tm for ~�f f c l '_ -:f..lWU - of n1 1 ) Qtl _ nt ny � wttb t e Cf>U..t't � h. pr sent p � it ion .. ..-......... l � . 19 .. �.,. l � s-tttloner, � �� & : f n 1 ln� ton l ne � -. t o. 1612 00 ~~gu- t 24. -- . pl ca at . �vl la fz . u us 19 6 onl �. 44 1
( r ' '- ) � 2, �� 1M f t �� � � � � 19 ' _, ... 442 � ( �� � . � L�
� .- � 1 ( } 0' h � 161~ � ,, 443
- '�� Itt f the ,..,.,....._. in1!:ar!~ � t 1 , as amtrncltea ( (} f the c t 444
.- � - 445
.. - �' t nt 10 $ tO ~ir:IHCtf! 0 .. h 1 � ... � ly llt t a ,e� .. .� c � - t 11 Q &h:Utgl $ f em n s wh pro ce c coa "~ c al �� f g clothe$ from od; ( er 0 v � t; ol� Int .. l ltil. } t 0 h 7J} . -c j (N 0 i.ek v , V;;; \ltl , G"' 1�.o. ... 9 9 ,, C<;t� lS. tto c: sl!c a# p � llg Cor � vs� Co. lee:: to:t of - ec ns v u� .J J)l 0 t'ilt ion} or tho ho }il .r ly ret n a f! tOJ: .r l s to ally purctt e fut:rt l (u . n � ~ l ctor of .I. � o� . . �� � '27 AU':J� s. 19~..7) ' r.d th se �ho tr r1t.for raw k PO el � ft n ligh pok v th� e c �� �� � . ordtrt tg.rt I tar ! (Co :'!'10 po A ne � � it s o.. 125; ~~~. also c 1 ..ap � c.,. � t ' 446
� - 9 .. p� � t n t tl �� sl , ta l t t \ .t 1 � tl Qsts $ th \ f \ I 447
� "'r ~l1:U..I ,F "t'H t': ....1 f"Ll'" "l-n~ H ~- AP.PEALS .AN.lJ.- T 1 - ... 6 t. - ���-�----X DI . it t � dd � co u nee 1 '� � t.' n u cu f 0 ... ct -n �~ t'! ~ ~� eh c T J i i. a :;_ c in t f n li " h � r i. p d t i � f ai :r: � n u n t 'f c 448
coc n t l n -2 - ta -1,: t c. t. s , t . c e .t ... t l.l � �E d"' ~- h� G � tt t l. ~ti n i :t: � ft d� n r lie 2, l r tr.. .. c 0 (; nl � r.in l 1 0 'I t c t ot i 1'". cti c f ut T t;~ -;. Ir Th . :{... c.ll ()v '" I 1'\ltfJ ' t. nt ~i. t (. til.!~ i!J. ;0 "'1 .. l t <nn ( > .n.. c b (., thli:lt c t 19�1' X �t ex . z:d ~ rc,-:. �, hi c n~1 ' rl cult re 1 li"' r c.,f ~~ f;" l:!.; r . - a . cu l <; !,jjd -:..n lit~ the I ta t .I tt.:vr.g it e c O n. c ~5 (\ � 19-1 X � :i.. <: c ... ny � ( ' 1 In ~ fH l � nc � <.; . ~ .. � � il J t <H C . i ti .n i n p 1 i our � 449
- - ... ... t i 1 b 450
- .. ... � 451
f l �~~~ ~�SN'f..J�;..,~ �r�..ttJlU1 � 1-. . :;fll �.~ .;~/i"'t ..~: } !t: i�. .. - :r� l i � t , tl ii t h }. � "'OOU9F; � ; � r. ;.'>tt:t..i �J y � /,-;�p iirrl inqui , elt�;! t tc, t~, r: in r:~in:i � ta~� in i ~. 452
... ... en ... � 'r�(�t- ..1 -d. 0 I ('Y � ... c� (' ~ .l. q 7' tJ '\ . :c�~ t ,. 453
et . h ~, 1'.� ti ~c.: n t "',~ \i' 'l> :\H & t .P -n t= ... P.c N ~ . 161?. �� �~ ~ rtl-rt in :. ~ . t f' '') 454
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 710 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 710)
- SCHAEFFLER PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10301)
- PHIL. GOLD PROCESSING & REFINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1121)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-88 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-88)
- AVALOQ PHILIPPINES OPERATING HEADQUARTERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10816)
- CTA Case No. 5922 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5922)
- METROPOLITAN NAGA WATER DISTRICT (MNWD) v. THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAMARINES SUR(CTA Case No. EB 1079)
- UNITED INTERNATIONAL PICTURES AKTIEBOLAG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9930)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.