[ G. R. No. 39489. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39489. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39489
[ G. R. No. 39489. June 02, 1934 ]
MARIA MAGLANOC, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. CIRIACO PUNO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Tarlac__________, dated the__________30th______________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees_________ recover from _________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-22687. March 28, 1969 ](137 Phil. 184)
- [ G.R. No. 163653. July 19, 2011 ](669 Phil. 323)
- G.R. No. 197492, January 18, 2017
- [ G.R. No. 203397. December 09, 2015 ](775 Phil. 284)
- [ G.R. No. 112574. October 08, 1998 ](358 Phil. 74; 95 OG No. 40, 7050 (October 4, 1999))
- A.C. No. 12713, September 23, 2020
- G.R. No. 203090, September 05, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 34714. October 01, 1931 ](G.R. No. 34714)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.