[ G. R. No. 38600. June 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38600. June 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38600
[ G. R. No. 38600. June 28, 1934 ]
THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER VS. CANDIDO ABANDO ET AL., CLAIMANTS, TOMAS REYES 2.0, CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT, FLORENTINO CACAYURAN,CLAIMANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________12th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________La Union ________, dated the __________7th__________ day of _________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________twenty-nine____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed with costs against the appellee, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellant_________ from the __________the appellee_________ the sum of P__81.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 8892. October 10, 1913 ](G.R. No. 8892)
- [ G.R. No. 1102. May 06, 1903 ](G.R. No. 1102)
- G.R. No. 203923, October 08, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 119464. January 28, 1999 ](361 Phil. 952; 96 OG No. 7, 982 (February 14, 2000))
- A.M. NO. RTJ-02-1743, July 11, 2006
- [ G.R. No. L-8844. December 16, 1914 ]
- [ G.R. No. 132963. September 10, 1998 ](356 Phil. 671)
- [ G.R. No. 105436. June 02, 1994 ](302 Phil. 801; 90 OG No. 45, 6757 (November 7, 1994))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.