jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ] 1934-05-25

[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 36374

[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]

CRESENCIO EXCONDE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, FELIX A. GESMUNDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellants.

It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.