[ G. R. No. 37875. July 14, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37875. July 14, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37875
[ G. R. No. 37875. July 14, 1934 ]
ROQUE SINCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ESTEBAN CABUSOG ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Oriental________, dated the __________15th__________ day of _________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. No expression as to costs.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-28505. August 29, 1969 ](139 Phil. 833)
- [ G.R. No. 105188. January 23, 1998 ](348 Phil. 700; 95 OG No. 10, 1550 (March 8, 1999))
- [ G.R. No. 204142. November 19, 2014 ](747 Phil. 542)
- G.R. No. 163280, February 02, 2010
- [ G.R. No. 1693. February 05, 1904 ](G.R. No. 1693)
- [ G.R. No. 13753. February 15, 1919 ](G.R. No. 13753)
- G.R. No. 227614, January 11, 2021
- [ G. R. No. L-2927. February 26, 1951 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.