[ G. R. No. 40815. August 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40815. August 04, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40815
[ G. R. No. 40815. August 04, 1934 ]
RAYMUNDO CONUI, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. BASILIA MEDINA VDA. DE CHUA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________2nd__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee_________ recover from __________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-4297. January 31, 1952 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-20569. August 23, 1974 ](157 Phil. 510)
- A.M. No. MTJ-00-1298 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 97-418-MTJ), August 03, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-30364. July 28, 1969 ](139 Phil. 110)
- [ G.R. No. 202039. August 14, 2019 ](859 Phil. 277)
- [ Per. Rec. Nos. 3527, 3408. August 23, 1935 ]
- G.R. No. 135150, July 28, 1999
- G.R. No. 175466, December 23, 2009
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.