[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 35424
[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
LUCIO VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. CIPRIANO DE TORRES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Batangas_________, dated the _________29th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from__________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__as costs.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.