CTA Case No. 4060 (Resolution)
Ct.'i'UBLIC OP >H� '1".. 1Ltl"l"t:-l:r9 ~OUR l' ''JF TAX f\.PPJ::.AU Q\JftON C:l ..-, T ( HILI I . ) � I c . titio r , - v r u.... - o. 40 0 �1 r L - - - - - X - ..... n n� X LU I ctin on th " ti n P r Wit dr wal Of t.i- tion r vi II fil d by et tion r on uq � t s. 1 7 on th ro n th t t d ici y in 0 t X nd w1 hh 1 1 Q t n nclu iv f in re t. n rc. r volv r in h d lr d n ttl d th ou.h co rt') ur.u to x cut1v o. � n t r b.in9 n obj c 1 n on t p rt 0 r n� h il 1n1 r by I ED . ly, t h r . vi w d Wi r m :1 I i c ( 0'1 i r cl d nd ..) J. on �r � , 7. ~jj:J ~ ~ Ul Jud 261
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.