jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ] 1934-07-13

[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 40109

[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]

EUGENIO TESTA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MAXIMO DE VERA DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bulacan________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement of costs.

It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.