SC JOHNSON PHILIPPINES, ROHQ, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court ofTax Appeals QUEZON CITY En Bane SC JOHNSON PHILIPPINES, ROHQ, CTA EB NO. 2269 Petitioner, (CTA Case No. 935 7) -versus- Present: DEL ROSARIO, P.J., COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL CASTANEDA, JR., REVENUE, UY, RINGPIS-LIBAN, Respondent. MANAHAN, BACORRO-VILLENA, and MODESTO-SAN PEDRO, JJ Promulgated: OCT 12 202~ n ---- X -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----- -------- X RES 0 L UTI 0 N ..:?: ~r~- . On 26 June 2020, petitioner filed a "Motion for Extension of Time to File Verified Petition for Review" before the Court En Bane. The same was granted by the Court on 29 June 2020, giving petitioner until 22 July 2020 within which to file its Verified Petition for Review. On 9 September 2020, however, the Court's Judicial Records Division issued a Records Verification Report, dated 9 September 2020, stating that, as of the date of its issuance, petitioner had failed to file its Petition for Review. WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, there being no Petition for Review filed within the period specified in the 29 June 2020 Resolution ofthe Court, this case is considered CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. Presiding Justice
RESOLUTION CTA EBNO. 2269 (CTA Case No. 9357) Page 2 of2 Q. c. C....~o.t. .9.... JUOOTO c. CASTANEffA, JR. Associate Justice ERL~.UY Associate Justice k'i� ~ .-J~ MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice tJ~;.~ CATHERINE T. MANAHAN Associate Justice \ JEAN MARIE -lli~"ORRO-VILLENA MARIA RO~EN~ il.ru;..; U-:"'Al"l PEDRO
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.