[ G. R. No. 37455. May 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37455. May 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37455
[ G. R. No. 37455. May 08, 1934 ]
BERNARD CUEVAS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MIGUELA DIAZ ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bataan________, dated the __________25th__________ day of __________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed insofar as it affirms the judgment of the Justice of the Peace of Limay and orders the defendant Migulea Diaz to restore possession of the land to the plaintiff, with costs in both instances against Miguela Diaz alone.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee___________ recover from _________the appellant Miguela Diaz_________ the sum of P__40.00___, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 47314. December 21, 1940 ](G.R. No. 47314)
- [ G.R. No. 215313. October 21, 2015 ](772 Phil. 234)
- [ G.R. No. L-24302. August 18, 1972 ](150-B Phil. 233)
- [ G.R. No. 135693. April 01, 2002 ](429 Phil. 483)
- [ RTJ-96-1347. June 14, 1996 ](327 Phil. 105)
- [ G.R. No. 9313. January 05, 1915 ](G.R. No. 9313)
- G.R. No. 180559, January 20, 2016
- [ G.R. No. 3978. February 18, 1908 ](G.R. No. 3978)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.