CTA Case No. 1872 (Decision)
/ '� 1\Ei i � ,� � �'r'' , i.~ ,. .PHILll'fiN,t!;tiJ COU H.'l UF 'L\X APPE.A.Li QUEZON ClTl' .....)_..__.,- .,-. "' . .. nt. 'l�, 2_5,.. t 0 01 Jl n of Q 1. 1. n n "' r p t. n . Ji 1 1.-p 11'1 , exi tio 8 a , la on, . zal. In t h 1 9 5 it � ui . tn .co 185' f b.~. of' Q - po .i tt.tio11 r of 2'5' . 7.57. t 1'1 1 0 "3 ~ th ? 28
... o.u (} ..o ~ ,aa t in ( ( ile p �ttt1oa~r ; r t s~ r t � a qaire u. 1 dict1 , 1� 1 et 1t1onc acw ~ ee -to ra ~ r 4 f' (. , ) . ., f' .f l . ! . . . �
.../''! c ... ~c f<) . 187 ~ tn , t cctr n t it i; l' t s b� n - '1cttc t.o ente t it b !.t.l. n 0 ... c. 1 ' ()n r t'irrl" ,Jt; .il G 0 v'l l ' � 19 '/. Cor....,equ r~.. tO 'i t atr- m t. ap ,l fo l.t k ..,... .1 1 totlon� ,, 30
� l ?? ' ,..._- � .p 1 ! t: J 2, 7 { i' 31
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.