CTA Case No. 1942 (Decision)
'lEPUJ\UC OF THE PBILIPPINE.I' CO UltT Q-F T.AX A~PE.A.LB QUEaO.N QT'W' ..'), �\ c1 1� n of 1 c- 0 s it ord th ':l ,� ... ne � cr . , _ .. f. 1...~ , one of' whoni r ar:i �r � 2 ' 1967 ' j lv �s l'i 111 �1
tr., . i .. r e�. � .t r 2
� .::J. ., �� })0 1 r t 0 ..... h r 0 a .1 ,. ,. ic r ir t. t v n 4pr .d 1- tl� d or t (!! C,ll~ t ( t'r .. t tr. "f. t . on ill'd t;:,o rr:-.v � Ut r. t 1 r 19~" t r 0 n<= t hv o� s Jj ct t pen en t 1l t.t
��~C S cT c, a ~o . t942 . . � !:!~ of' th pl~ -i gs and c.u t m r-cor ( ;p � .- t . s . . ; � 25, Cl r ) Th. sole i ....s i vo v in this case 1 w t r or not t j i t .ney 1 que~rtion s su j ct s ollow ; .... - c un~ r th af r , oted ...r �Visio of law two ( ) co. d~tion .S to j ify the for- f it re or ' otor v icl n ely: ( th t he .. ctor ve icl rl . a.ctually u c1 n . co veya . oe o r iol s ubj ct to o fe tur�. un r th T iff ntl C'u t � s La� t:l ; . nd ( } tx �e th o er of h 4
-�.' ... ~� f~:'' ll~l ... C , CA.::�� ~ () ., 1 . ti."" � !t i - to Cod � � o tus 1 it ollo 5
r:e..: nr) - e�, ; c .: , . ,� 19 ~ ' 6 v y 'lg � 1;u s al n th Ot � �es Jtrrmary t rne i w ~ a~.re~c dnd, it� w a c ,s .~a .. d V'C~; , 1 o ll s .ul r t t' ( p. 1 � ; n� � 17 Pt . f:-r "t Vi w)� ha t Jr.. .... 1' 4.1 .0 t ... y fr 1t � -� o t' r 1 th t, ol'" 1 . ot a 1 .a 'I 1J ...? . <p, 1;i, th v� !13 u ctio~1s to ' -~ ll driv no to .e J1tn. !J 4 1lf: 1 (S 16- 1? \.. zto� r,co . ) . r e .b1. a v;� c 1.1 r . �n ; �1..... 11, Ci t y, to� e r:1 o 1e ' 1) ox t . �t. r-� r ct�v� t .:1 1 h . c . c. .t illt:'d ( ts, t 1 th . ..flt11.,.J 6
Hll f!O 12', fMt� �-1, t3.one:r it 1 1 or th~ ct~ of !tL dr V(!'r,.) �n<:'-. r 1mi lar t...ti'Ct t.S 1 ~ovlrc:~<r'~'l''e lt,_ t!� i.S .':'JtU"t h :Id :to t~i.e eatte f ~ ntonio ~~ � V � vic! ~n C"" l?ld-dt~C(;! dta~1 a~~ thE. t.t~ l' ~- 1 Sht.1d 7
D?l.t l J:%J~l ... ~ �1. CA.. ''t � � � 1 'h 1! l 1 t ... 1rt pu ll � �
I 1 n t' . o� . -I rli ~ t � y \.1 ! 1 n l 1i t G 1t r '"' ~ f b,c lS'J~ r ul 0 ~ '� 0� ... 0 .. -g
. ....�. no r
1 I � Costs ag inst petitioner � � � � � 11
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. OC-592 (Decision)(CTA Case No. OC-592)
- CTA Case No. 5683 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5683)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NEXT MOBILE INC. (Formerly NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PHILS., INC.),(CTA Case No. EB 1864)
- SAMAR-ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6697)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. IRISH FE N. AGUILAR, ET. AL.(CTA Case No. EB 1859)
- CTA Case No. 5914 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5914)
- STERLING TOBACCO CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 4532)
- CTA Case No. 6409 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6409)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.