CTA Case No. 729 (Order)
/ ( P H l L l Pl ' I N D ./ ,. APPFAI '- , /l PEDBO A. lVIA'i-.JACSA , Petitioner, - versus - C. T. A . CA.:lE NO. 729 THE (;Qv1Jv1ISSIONErl OF USTOlv1S , espondan-t. X- - - - - - - - - - - - X 0 HD E eti~ioner or his counsel having failed to appear ~+ +he hearing of the above - entitled case on MArch 13, 1961 , the motion to dismiss m~de by / counsel for respondent in open court is nereby granted , for failure of petitioner to prosecute. The nurgent: f/iotion for Postponement I filed by counsel for petitioner on the same date , March 13, 1961, but after the session of the Court , should be , a s it is hereby denied for the reason tha~ it does not: comply with Se c tion 1 , dule 9 of the Rules v of the Court of T~x Ap~ . ::iO OdDErlED . Manila , Marc h 22 , 1961. d~c:41 MAHI No~ N A BLE Presiding Judge ~ � �Ov l\J M. Ub!J\L I ssoc ia~e Judge
More in CTA Orders
- CTA Case No. 2038 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2038)
- ABS-CBN PUBLISHING, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9410)
- HI-STAKES GAMING, INCORPORATED, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10211)
- CTA Case No. 2311 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2311)
- THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HON. ALFONSO G. CUSI v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9596)
- ALMA MILAGROS V. AQUINO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9641)
- CTA Case No. 2708 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2708)
- CTA Case No. 1299 (Order)(CTA Case No. 1299)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.