[ G. R. No. 39758. July 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39758. July 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39758
[ G. R. No. 39758. July 11, 1934 ]
JERONIMO VER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MERCEDES VER , DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT, FLORENTINO VER ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Norte________, dated the __________19th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the modification that the co-heirs of Mercedes Ver will not be required to pay her the sum of P4,255.00, without costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx___________xx___________xx___________xx___________ recover from ___________xx___________xx___________xx___________the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. 04-10-296-MTCC. July 28, 2008 ](582 Phil. 12)
- [ G.R. Nos. 71163-65. November 09, 1990 ](269 Phil. 262)
- G.R. No. 175460, April 14, 2008
- G.R. No. 133579, May 31, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-39498. December 23, 1983 ](211 Phil. 530)
- [ G.R. No. L-7280. January 20, 1956 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-24398. October 25, 1977 ](169 Phil. 536; 74 OG No. 12, 2316 (March 20, 1976))
- [ G.R. No. 19630. March 13, 1923 ](G.R. No. 19630)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.