jurisprudence[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ] 1934-05-04

[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]

[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]

G. R. NO. 35898

[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]

TOMAS CABRERA, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, BRIGIDA BELLO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the appellant.

It is further ordered that _____________the appellee__________ recover from the __________the appellant__________the sum of _________P40.00_________, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.