[ G. R. No. 39835. May 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39835. May 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39835
[ G. R. No. 39835. May 03, 1934 ]
FORTUNATO FLORENTINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MANUEL ENCARNACION, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________7th__________ day of __________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of the instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee ___________ recover from ___________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 100228. July 13, 1994 ](304 Phil. 260)
- [ G.R. No. 47519. June 10, 1941 ](G.R. No. 47519)
- G.R. No. 140278, June 03, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 143964. July 26, 2004 ](479 Phil. 1)
- [ G.R. No. 220558. February 17, 2021 ](897 Phil. 328)
- [ G. R. No. 5963. September 13, 1910 ]
- A.M. No. MTJ-04-1563 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 02-1207-MTJ), September 08, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 119325. September 26, 1996 ](330 Phil. 1039)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.