SUMISETSU PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION SUMISETSU PHILIPPINES, INC., CTA CASE NO. 8494 Petitioner, -versus- ACOSTA, Chairperson UY, and FABON-VICTORINO, JJ. ~�:~~�~:~t~ -~~~~~~~:- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, X - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- RESOLUTION During the hearing on August 31, 2012 of petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petition filed on August 24, 2012, Atty. Katherine Soto appeared for petitioner while Atty. Felix Paul R. Velasco III, appeared for respondent as the handling counsel, Atty. Christopher Sandico, has already resigned from the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Petitioner's counsel manifested that in view of the recent change of management, petitioner was no longer interested to pursue the instant case, and there being no objection from respondent's counsel, the motion was GRANTED. The instant Petitioner for Review was considered WITHDRAWN. WHEREFORE, this case is deemed CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. LL<. a~ ... ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Justice AEs~~~.tiUcYe
More in CTA Resolutions
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. VIBAL GROUP, INC, KRISTINE E. MANDIGMA, and MARICEL T. VILLAS G. Araneta corner Ma. Clara Street Talayan, Quezon City (AT LARGE)(CTA Case No. O-1198)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ANGELITO O. DELA PE?A Km. 17, Mc Arthur Highway, Malanday, Valenzuela City or Prenza I, Marilao, Bulacan (AT-LARGE)(CTA Case No. O-1076)
- CTA Case No. 6835 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 6835)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SHELLA MARIE LATOMBO AGUADO 183 San Vicente, Macabebe, Pampanga (AT-LARGE)(CTA Case No. O-1037)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. RAEKEN MARKETING CO., INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1353)
- EGIS PROJECTS S.A. v. THE SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND COMM. OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8413)
- CTA Case No. 1432 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1432)
- ALBERTO B. FINEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9715)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.