CTA Case No. 393 (Decision)
- -- - � r x��-�------x l 1S 1 a p t - he rec �ery ef t 6, 019. a11e � to have y� d ( 11 z-� ef c ale 1. hla case f %' la n as1� eta ln't f t par ~s x� ( f1cJ.al celpt 1 67 t C1n pa t. n. f 1n a t � n 1 � in hls cas � t1t.1 ne~ ln t. ufactur still y at - ' ) c d n 1. e 1t I lat er�a pl c f 436
�2� i�tllluy � ;JeSnt cl fll pursuant t �ec� 't 1.~ �f tM ax C.CS. ancl w tb the appnval ef J"eaptmdent. The ale� �1 Ota:SM & itc u 1 ( � t�at alee 1) . " .. ttecU.y cnde �1 ys J:recl furthe~ dlttUlats.n .-ec-tlf tl�n s.n atl etlti..-r'� fl*. ucs.n allty ~ .n ba1~w.. petit...,;..,. and lK 1 aU ale� 1 Jalllil.iti.L.tiJillli&llWl..ID..llli.IDIU. �� 11 �� ny ~J.fJ.c tax t.M � ld fu the ~ � � ace t . June 1. 12 an4 1 , �&2, n~n �� �� ....,leG f~ pttJ.t14Nla' the apectlve p f lit�~� 11� s.n live.- f 1n � � nUa{- .. - ��� � , � and � f �t1t1 fez v w). vw etet ec:l ttMa.. aSMtt� � ltDn fu vl ). lptC1f1C t� 4, 288 ~�f lit�~� � ale h�l� len "P" ell fezenc� tWMn he t tal qu tity f c � 1 _,..,...,.~ �� d.Utill that e1v ,........-x � �.. � ~e 1t1on f �vt )� - i.S &II niM p: t�rtecl by pet1t u 437
1nt pt 'e tl. sum f ...o p o : llt r s of lc h n for � thiu t� ( ~n - ). d 1C t1 , pt r py t -t � 52 .d � ct1v y, n t . nt u t h eh Q r . ccu t gr ff d 11 an ne y t t f ,o 9. ... � n y 0 flc ltl r ) . 438
.- fu �f � H h V!J � eat t filed � tltl n n uly 12. ~9 7 1n t d dl1n f 3uly 11. l 7 tc laat ay �f tn. .....,,.,._____ 1rl t� - er � �ly c �� c 11 t � an11a. � ta!n � 1 ot coll � t� stl at n t 10 n1 t � c c c e1f c t � lin t1t � a - �v le ut - 1fleat1 � t , to �- () e iC f X tn 1t1 �n 1 11 � . ep � p 1t er Xn cr lc l 439
- ... � Vll at 'V v � f fl(,i ..� y � ) (C � 440
.- "� :1" l 1 tn� ale .. vt v- t c X' n � t. 1e 1tJ.on c t if I. � � p �f X. �� al l hi � C! 1 � � ~� ). 441 r~
� 3 .., - 1- ... t' �,..,� t eff ��- �� y .. � c- t X � - 442
/.J r -- � � � 24, ), � c pr: t� f �l 1" d. t, � rf �� n, n d 27) . � t X ly � ,. 4 43
-- � all t ex- lUI n ~ the C utat � 0 the K1f t X t le UtUl le1t y .v ~I" 10 1n be p e a u� t1 n � ( � � � 4. � el 1 , y 1 �t. t . , W\4118: y the ac f t � pay t �f t lf.S.C t. � t . � 1 uc . y-Uleliet01'11ty � l6 r � Ul y � � 1). / � '{h. �: � ale l 1sc ' a ntr 1 ,_ ..._...,. � �fh � f1n11 e4 Drl~' ta � o recti ieat d OU.IV� � - ject � the h � It e.r, � �. t 441
c 1c . 39 - - l t y1 �. l t � 11 f pl � � t � loa � � .e c the C.V& fl e ~� � ale 1 � ... fn ev 1 c: in 1f1C (; 1 'th c ur�� � &) . ~ a ca � .�.� ... - por 1 r n t .~.. t t pl � lecte t ten s>e t ~~t � --~--�� � l t h c ata against petitioner. 445
-- � - 11 - �� � 446
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 693 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 693)
- THE CITY TREASURER AND THE CITY GOVERNMENT OF TAGUIG CITY v. BELLAGIO TWO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2843)
- FORTUNE TOBACCO CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with CTA Cases Nos. 6612 & 6383)(CTA Case No. 6365)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION, MANILA BRANCH(CTA Case No. EB 5)
- AMADEUS MARKETING PHILIPPINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2685)
- CTA Case No. 7047 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 7047)
- CTA Case No. 3818 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3818)
- CTA Case No. 4844 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4844)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.