CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 730730 1963-10-29
CTA Case No. 730 (Decision)
n11 lA ��1'. � c s. o. 7 p J � ve s - na nt.. X� ~- � � ~ � � - � � � c1 iti n I' ppe eisi n of tn in t of 1 .� cto of ct t e forfeit � of nt o.s! � drie hr nd cell ... loi � 22.00. fae ci to of r p nd- nt d t ov � fr which quot t 3 'J 1""1 v'
o� .730 �2- ! -c - I? i ile o ion t� ci io of on nt t. pl -li i;.it i i <; i t1 C1rC s X n ui � d. �l 1 l() .r' - � ti n n F:!.nd n t ,ec oi C' ~f:' , . 1. 0 f Cffi in Ord 1 th :� 374
SCI �1 -3 � � by 1 d. i h coat 0 � i l � ro 0 r 29 , 1 � � :-37 5
More in CTA Decisions
- TRUSTMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9072)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE., LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9154)
- FABTECH KITCHENS UNLIMITED, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10795)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PERPETUAL SUCCOUR HOSPITAL OF CEBU, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2122)
- CTA Case No. 2124 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2124)
- PRIME STEEL MILL, INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8818)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY (MERALCO)(CTA Case No. EB 363)
- CTA Case No. 5435 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5435)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.