CTA Case No. 1878 (Decision)
-- . Kf"UBT.IC OJ' ":Qi~E PHILIPP.INU COURT OF TAX APPEALS 4lU.EZON Cl'RY 1 . . .I . E� - ... -- ... - - -... � ~ ,~J~ 1 .... l 6� l n t. ,, 170
,l ~~~ ,.f c1 l ..,.. ,;;7 ,, 9 ~Jlr� ;; . n lt r "."�,., .. Qf~.l:l '� 1 on ' i..i- trl�! ,., 1. in 1,t 0 � . ':1 ~ Ot tl r C! t � 1 :;, l'- 0 Ml 0' ,t;h :t re a '�l .. r l. cr. rc. r " -.:-t . iii 1 '� a ~: 171
3 In l. tt t J n .( , 9 3, t ft ion l 1 � tor �1 >ll - �0 1, t r-- t d bi d.JS~ ( d o ... J !' a no ore:)� r ly 2 ) , 9 3 1 or 4, �o not ot e 1t ' 0 'h.. r. � of or .ry t or n � rn-l a en c. of lJ" 0"" D r t - 0 in i ' .re,.ly CL~ 17, ~ �aua~r 1 ulr1� u.t s.till ~tl - s1 t 1 � ~ rei 1 ~ , '1- o~ thfJ r "one 25;1; ' ;,;.; .t ' t t2q\1e t nsaional Dir ctor l.tl 111 r l , 19 , he t O'l 'til r,' t: e r <.:Ot' , of' � 1 c t'o tv fir l 10 .. On l2, r. ' tl
�,..... ,;.; ill Df�i - otQ., r t c �e1 to qf 1n ht~ ru i 1 ity of t i'!)osit1.on or r 1- d1 or t 0 ro n r tn 1 h t .. ( ~,..: ) (.1 a s f rom � e1 . "' he of, o tl'K 25;;t su �,: ,hf..t'U .. r .rec tvl ~~ ttl.i l ott'" r on~'~ r o r~t 5,1965, . t1.... -�c n n in � '1 r 1 er l0 ' 1 � th:. r r-po - t� n ;~: ll' ruary l-:..;..,. 1 o~5~~.. av .a r th~; t i J:p ri , � 9t;-6 , tLe ctri<: ot ,.. f 11 t ' 1. l f r t- 0 l of .. .1'\ .g in t .�.r uh t:: , ore �h s 'Ll - ti t~... � l � � ion . V' ':d fro , �fl ~~ .�..~... 1�67, p"�titioz ,r e i.3 1' �or r ezo. tt~r 1 n e l eo 'th l.'t 0 �,lvO., l .s 173
.. ,...._,.. tJ. (..; M C-t,..;~ l'IV. l (8 15, 1 "7, en. t. eolle~o:t 25 surcharge bet r~ ,'0� c 1, n Ju.l ~ 1 , t 7, t p 1 1o r. I' on 1n ~ 1 c ,, . 1 "o� t t~ t. ...r: t z: r in - ~ l tte 174
pone � cont nt � t t 1! t! .r r t1d 1. r~ot ��..,.p or r nntt., t~ .tJ 10 .t � a... . ..1p t. t. pr t .., t 1,; p 'tltion fil- t 0 ti ., tit Ct "'l', f r 1 p ' t , . it t f'ut th ... .. p lfl .:l...,O l!!iO � .,. ... : "~S �o ~::1tte l l.nl �5' t it t tt 1,;; t r :r cc ~ � tiC-. l of �'e, ru. � r.:t l l 19 5 was ot �etl t .�s tt "t ~qu.. . , r- 0 � i onl)' 0 &JUly 1<'') . 7 e1 ~ i n .... 1 for co 1 ction "I h r a_p01.1 em in- t.f) 1.1 el ~Oil t r '4' .. l trtt- day r 5, .it r.'i � "~ t l lte -~ /'"1t p d~ct �I ~-~ d, 0 �Pt' ar'i .).' l' .... ne ). 0 �, l' n� 1 r 1 ' .. ro Jula , l" a � 1967, to mruo.n~� ' '.Ug4~t J .l e l)i} l �"a fiL . in ' bi, t;; ".o r l!t tio .. c� ~ ui .$ ll&t on ~Ui l ~$ ' <3 ,) (_� ua~ �t t on d r ' 1 not 0 inion Ot t ...o - ;i.s 1 .r 1~ t l .. tili.V<!;I.nu .. , uot f~ 0' l ~ ;;)>Ill'- ..D cto u. x:� 1� ~� 1 tn c. ...r aet :t or c 1 dtl is r- 1 ee t i on (.! no 17S
7 h;.a~ n 1; b'l l ,. r>fl .re ... .1n r it $ of ri f:.. .. ..'. t 0 s .. Coll ot t" oJ� .�u :;,r i_,.l ~. .ev nue .. - (-l ' - � 1217 .... .. !"il l~:r'--2) h ' c as "f1 ... 1 n ..ts t s .. e- ai .. 'lor, n . tlti;:,a.-r to " � on~- n t.lJ 1. �p .. bil � +..�. ~ . ia C- .., ""o ()tion 'Q.;;; ut 1" h at h .. ~l ' 1so !'.: �.nd . w.~.e.. tf' ) .r>r ou �y. L.;--t t" 11' { t or ' on!ll!J .."' tto11, h:w n 1(:t tl,u~ ~H" �tttonar lle .rd f.t"OI:il a ... l;ti7 oJ. is - ot Cl" '" () .. Orll ;; t1oo ll �d ,.rabl" f ll . 1 mc.mtt t tt ... r- ~ clsio 0 "19..:.. j 'o5 l.dl -tl- �~ 1 .!'o ..coo~� � t ',t f:;:'O nt tl Ci� ' .u. �-.era 1; solut y (}f' nt Q 1 br 1 o~" t�' s .~.oti .n fc,r r c n 1 � ... ~t on o:: �~hru.a y l 1 .. 5, io oth1ng tt it . t -:\ c. . a~: b 'i 1 u c� t1o tor Ol nt 0 n l .. 176
,~ rj � l. ' . , "'"1~ . c. ,. 2 I;' t 0 , ~ L~ 1 , ""' n ' . r- ..1p or r icn o' < . r ;; ' l9 5. " l (.; ) t .� Oi J l L t lo
,. '�". l 7 r~p 0. llO t 1o r:s n d 1 0 1 1G (; r �t r C'"' te - r co l,) ,tion on t �Q! t.� a 1fi .... ov �ore "'! :11) t (i or - ' � r. q t1 ... .s ts '01" 2:Jr; $ i� ot rr t a - cr r� or .1 ra. 'ion or 'a Ph ;lg� 1- �� Inc. ) � t I.. J't l 11 r en' r ' .,1 tner 178
At � ���14-ittUt!;llJ JLJie* Jf1fll ,_. .� te n � 179
. 180
f .) .. 1 oon , 0 1 . 3 ~ l 9. I 12 . --~- . tI~--� co 181
More in CTA Decisions
- HALLIBURTON WORLDWIDE LIMITED - PHILIPPINE BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9670)
- CTA Case No. 6210 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6210)
- CTA Case No. 6285 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6285)
- UNIOIL PETROLEUM PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11222)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE INVESTMENT CORPORATION PTE LTD,(CTA Case No. EB 1401)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GLOBAL FRESH PRODUCTS INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2392)
- THIRD MILLENIUM OIL MILL INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7583)
- CTA Case No. 5773 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5773)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.