[ G. R. No. 39565. May 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39565. May 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39565
[ G. R. No. 39565. May 15, 1934 ]
TEODORO R. YANCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SY CHIAP ET AL., DEFENDANTS, ALBERTO MERCADO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the __________5th__________ day of __________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from _________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 30892. March 25, 1930 ]
- G.R. No. 120859, June 26, 2001
- [ G.R. No. L-8162. August 30, 1955 ]
- [ G. R. No. L-48922. October 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. No. 116110. May 15, 1996 ](326 Phil. 762; 93 OG No. 23, 3510 (June 9, 1997))
- [ G.R. No. 130562. October 11, 2001 ](419 Phil. 445)
- G.R. No. 242165, September 11, 2019
- [ G.R. No. L-1506. December 22, 1947 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.