CTA Case No. 277 (Decision)
r, L 1 I I I I I� 'l I l t � ' I'A l.O uH1 u l 1.\~ A!>!>.t:A.L5 MAN1U. I ,~<:,~ TI Tl P�ttttoTnler,� � VC'IUI � rj�~' LlE T INTE L VENUE , eapon ent. - - x� � - - .... - � � .. � -x Il This is an app�al fr � a dae1s1on of the rts� pon � t ollec ~ f Internal even e, dated reb ������in 13, 1 ~6, a ainst, an e a ing fr , the petit! ner nlted tists rporation, the ount o 2 ,550. x, on six (6) imported cine� ato rap tc fll �� lus n a dltlonal au of s co r !ae penalty, or a total nt o r he take of revity e all not t er- un er tn its ntirety the partial st ulation of fact f the erties as a pearing on pages � 21 f th rec t will � ntton only of those fact ap- pearln therein htch el1eve are pertinent an ecessary in the firial adj d1catlon of t e case as 11 �� t � content� of the dditlonal unc tea e docu entary evi ence pretent d by th p&rt1��� The petitioner herein is a eat!c corporation uly or anlzed and ex1at1ng n er the lna of the Philippines. It atnta!nt an office at the tate ildin , izal Avenue, anila , and 11 en d in t � distribution f cine ~to raph1c f!l s for exhi it! n. 572
- � 277 - 2- It a peu� th t so e 1Jae 1n the year 1 49 � Alfred � ulla, Inc. , another do est!c corp atlon then 1ng, opuati an a1nta1nin a fil exc ange 1n anlla. an the d!atr!buto~ of the films produced in e ~nited tates of A arica , by agle Lion Pll a, Inc. , receive fr the otion Picture �~vice of th� United tate� y, atx (6) ctne atographic filma ith the following titleaa 1. -cannon City" 2. "He alkea y 1 ht" � uLet�a Llve � Little� ~. � ort est tamped�" 5. " arole, Inc.� an 6. sland.� 11 t � e 11 , except the laat one ere pro ce an ne y !laa, Inc. , an were dtstri te � oulle, c., for �xh1b1tlon ln theaters nila ~n n he rov!ncea, without the epa nt of t eel ic tax � t e � n he unt of � It ap, ars urther t at lfre � ulle, I _c. , ala rted tree ly r t � nt~� tates several .copies of. the f! � entioned above t i t p i � c eapond!ng apec!f!c tax aue an paya le thereon. y 11, 19~1 , the ale L1 n 11 a, Inc., filed a civil c laint ( an1la 1vil Caae o. 1 7 1, xh. �~ , pp. �116 I rec.) a � oull , Inc., or failure f the latter tore it to the for r ta hare t e receipts fro the exhibltio of th 573
"" o. 277 - 3- � �� c on� A a � lt of t. aphtc fil 1n this c tv11 a t!on , lf ed A. oulle, s dis� po �� all th fil � p ced � Eagle Lion 11 �� nc. Ut' to t st uct on o� 1ts ot er co any, the Unit Artists Corpor tl in t � u 1 ed tat a, the petit! ntr toe over 11 t � y 1� L1on 11 s, Inc., tnel lftg the lx (6) e n ato ~�P tc f! ms receiv :r the t�t�� a � the auth ~lt dt�tri� ut r the eof s. As regards the si ( 1� he auojeet f t , � instant c ntr - t �~ ib1 y t � � t er~ t t ere h f fur � h~ � ct. IX" of r J. - e et! io er t t 11 t X ( ) in 1 tt xtn 11 .he e-. ta f - ts ! ' lev � it c � n� f the reau f I ue. o. 107.) ter � earin , the Confera c taf � i r no for be llec r of Inte nal evenue y a nanl ue d.e!.s on l.t � th t at ������ en of .1 .00 � .. a ina t � � or ration It further re c � t at � 1 574
� 277 _ ar ed iately t o the usi: e ax D! s1on for the pr t asses nt of t nst Alfr d .. � 0 11 � Inc." ( Y. � ree.) � �1 - y I ev nu the res on .nt Collecto f n rn 1 di pprov d th t on of th c n- ferenee Staff, nd no 1 ns sts o th coll ct n of t he 8 � P c� 1<: t )( n t th pet t oner r �n. f nc � t~t 0 inst ant ap h th C r Ju . 6. Un r th f ct , s r d y t e � bl nt y v!d nc � t OV t n t d rt!sta C rp r n 11 or h p h cf et x 11 f nt rn c 11 ? t nly at on t dt t � ection l of t v nu C � ch o rn~ t. c /1 ( 1nder th ot v no t � s rt � t el � t ( 1) ) on 1 bl f r th p y- nt o he s c ftc t x n. th n t r ists Corpor t on i t c ine ato r ph c 1lmw n ch s cfc aeses aed , th n f. h uld � th t ot her hand , f corpor 0 0 1 tin 5 ' ~ r'J f&J 51;1..
c. � � � 277 -~ - �ny 0 t t o cat rles, or th h nd nt oll cto of nter 1 ah legally l i & coli ctlng t th 0� ft f r th p y - t1on' htch r ll indlc t1 t � oulle , Inc. an not the p t ti r t � Art ta Cor .rati on.J 0 t� ow , t p t!tion c:ine ato � h c: fil $ tat y? � tip 1 tion o t c 16, 1 7, h!ch p i S U$ conelu n r. T t a hie c. � by t 1Ln � 1 ion 1t or n1 n, 0 ' t!o !s n n rt � t fr: t �� rati cr � e r !- ti 0 y eontr - r c .no lute gle Lion 1 � I ( X� b- (( � "' p. 2 rec.) t ua no pr to c 1 petitioner is th 0h ( ) ein rP c film in controv rsy. I 1 n a 1 d n 1- ��ttl d r le t 1 juri let1 r of collet tng C t X on � cl � 5?'6 511
c o. 277 C. T. A. - 6 .. nited t t ea bases 2nd tn t llatione ln the Phi lippin er for !gn t r!tory. (Go hen Tee vs. r , 7 o. G. 269 , Suppl nt; o. 12, De<:. , 19 1J ur In1port xp rt Co., Inc. v � � o. L-2927 , J n. 26, 1951.) H nc � oods are re d f r � nd br ug t outs d of a Un ted �� y tate a r tall ti n, th is 1. port .. t1 n 1n t he ey � of th 1 � n t person auch re val and tr nsf r s consid red t � In the sen ca , it is itt y ot rt!ea t at it �� � oull � Inc., n t- t1oner er in c vd ix f 1 s1n estio fro th Un r y, ca �� t h fro th juri d t f t � lat er . c� � ou11� , I c. i �� a t ho ir t y t � c rre p c f c tax h r n, and ot t .) f r at t1ti n r 1 ld 1 bl or t nt of t � tx n c ph c 1nas ch s 1t cc d d to p a1n t pin! n of A y. f il.Jn, th approv Ubal o rabin , t n t!ng Ch f , v 1 n, ur u of Internal v nu , a f. for the Collect or of Int rn 1 v nu ated t b � 195~. 5 77 6 /C
lSI � 277 �r�� - 7- l il tl a per ae51l 0t ay � ld lia le f r the ci c tax � t r� n. ec l 2� Internal J � J tc re 1 r!ty t ax - � nt 1t ie t - er or t 1 �� � nt .) n t � ed u � ( � � � � 1:>2-1 th ts 57
� 277 -0- 1 � - tlo ion o h respo 0 1 ct r f In- � ternal v nu re y .reversed. t � petitio r ti t or or ti i h r y deel r d fr fr p t of th c f c X nd e pr lty in the t tal f u j ct o pre6iient app 1. th ix l ) ;r c i d y Al r � ull , 1 t Unit t y t ut ounc as cost � � r 1 � 1 57. 1 � h111 P n � I the result. " .. 579
More in CTA Decisions
- TeaM Energy Corporation (Formerly Mirant Pagbilao Corporation) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6957)
- ICONIC BEVERAGES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8607)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1926)
- ADELANTADO CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10406)
- CTA Case No. 527 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 527)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CASAS + ARCHITECTS(CTA Case No. EB 2589)
- ASIAN NAVIGATION AND TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7999)
- SR METALS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9253)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.