[ G. R. No. 39600. July 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39600. July 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39600
[ G. R. No. 39600. July 09, 1934 ]
ELISEA.SERRANO DE SENTENO, APPLICANT AND APPELLANT, VS. CESAREO SERRANO ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPEELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22nd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees _________ from the __________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 154297-300. February 15, 2008 ](569 Phil. 147)
- G.R. No. 122246, March 27, 1998
- A.M. No. RTJ-97-1390, August 05, 1998
- A.C. No. 9057 (Formerly CBD Case No. 12-3413), July 03, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 225100. February 19, 2020 ](871 Phil. 323)
- G.R. No. 209544, November 22, 2017
- [ G.R. No. L-42514. January 25, 1990 ](260 Phil. 426; 87 OG No. 29, 4116 (July 22, 1991))
- [ G.R. No. 215750. August 17, 2016 ](793 Phil. 548)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.