CTA Case No. 3673 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS UUEZOI-1 CITY ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION~ CTA CASE NO. 3b73 Pf~t i t i oner, .... v f:~ �p sus -- ACTING COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE? l:;:es pond en t. X- - - - - - - - - - - X RES 0 LUT I 0 N ~~ c t :i. n q on t h e 11 rl o t :i. C>l1 t; o W:i. t h c1 �p a w Pet :i. t :i. em 11 f:i. .l.ed by pet;:i. tione�p on rlay a,:.:J� ,, 1991:?. in '" bl1ve-- entitled case on the ground that the tax liabilities sought to be collected therein have already been the ~:;u bJ ~~ct of '" com pTclm :i. f,;e sett; 1 E~ment bet;w�-)en thf~ parties, with petitioner paying the compromise amount of P560~353.30 as evidence by photocopy of BIR Paym1~nt No. and Bank Conf:i.�pm;:\t:i.Dn F~ecE~:i.pt 1-lo. B�-1.92!:'i0237 ~ bo�th dc:\tE~d 1�1,:\y i~H, :1.9'::!0, thu~, �t'+?ndf�~�t':i.n~l t;his c,:\se moot ,:\ncl i:\Cc\dE~m:i.c, ct nd be:i.nq no objE~ct;:i.cln on of �s'es pond ent. The CouTt RESOLVES, as pTayed for, to GRANT said mot :i. on. L~:~t th!~~ pe�t :i. t :i. on fO"I' "l'eV:i.f.�)W be c Cl n s :i. d f.�~.,, E�) d 194
RESOLUTION CTA CASE NO. 3673 - 2- withdrawn and this case deemed closed and ter minat ed. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Mett~o Manila, May 14, 1992. ~... A :J;; 'il. ~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge SATsE;~~D~4AaDtIeVJAuSd-gFe RRALES ~1t-v;/'..._ CONS ANTE e(. R~IN Associate Judge 195
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1923 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1923)
- REGUS SERVICE CENTRE, PHILIPPINES B.V. - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10124)
- CTA Case No. 3832 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3832)
- CTA Case No. OC-2749 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. OC-2749)
- CTA Case No. 3698 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3698)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8708)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. VIRGINIA T. MANALO (VTM Quilts Collection, Inc. and No. 368 Aglipay Street, Barangay Poblacion, Mandaluyong City(CTA Case No. O-755)
- OFFSOURCING PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10257)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.