CTA Case No. 1415 (Decision)
JII EPURUC P T 1' JLI PI COuRT OF TAX APPEALS UEZON CITY ' �11 ... .. - ,. .. ... c
� - 0 11 � � 1 1� 1 . +'
�1 - 1 ' 3- 1- ' 1 3 t l () to t - t l' 8
1 7( ) � 11 ; 0 n l 0 11 0
1 � � � 0 1 0 1 10
� 11 1t .- 1 t I 1 l h �I 1 �? e t0 11 -
�1 7 � � ; 1 t � 7 � ). 12 .. �
- 01 �� l 1 e �
� 11 t � 14
� 11 1 .... l � ' � 5' 15
� 0 � � 1 ( 7 1. �� 1� 16 '
- s 1 l' io 0 37- t � � 1 'l ' ( �� u ' jJ 17 '
-1 15 13 0 ~ .~ � ��� 0 .. 7 � 1 l ) � l: 18
c 1 15 1 ..
� -1- 15 � 1~ � ; Yr � � 31 � � .) n c � b� � .) � ., 17 � r 't 1 n1 - 1, ' ; �� ' 11 � r 11 11 , 1' 175, t on n 0 l or 0 n 1' 0 n n' , 20
1 1 ( � � ) 3l t1 -- � � 1 0 1 19::~ � 21
- 1' 1 17 1 .j ' 22
15 1 a 1 ot � () . r�� n p ' 1 1 0t 1 � - :� 23
1 0 ' t ' � / 1 1 II 24
n t 1 ')7 () 0 ' ' .. � ... r li . 25 "'
�1 .. 1 I r - d r 0 t� ~. � 0 l0 c 0 on .. 0h �- l 1 ont � � y ~ 1 66 . It 26
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.