jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ] 1934-07-06

[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 39957

[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]

MARIANO MARCELO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. CANDIDA ROBLES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________30th__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.