CTA Case No. 2490 (Decision)
pr ' � f' (l � ' ' r I~ P. , ;:; ' �. \~'PEAL.::) Cul tt I' CITY QUblO. Oll� t .. vor 1..1 ) CI , Je 1t .o.t s��stai .ad t h.nt or lor i' rc.. dool.~rin ~ yn.t �tle (. o ln.~) �wov�n ''au 1c' . eh a.t�r lv n amt I''' o, 19?2 , r �l .�� 'I:n:1wo.o , s at r itl 365
~ """ ��. 21 90 J u� s� d o 1 o, �-"1 �n of . 31?50. 00 , n 1.< ad of 37,560. 0" ns "{)~ n y t .. ./'\uti!.~ � tlt1 n.o;r e n..; :!> d t ~::at h (le~crl ,; ti 1n t
n,~;UilO! .. C ~A Lif,~iG .~~'� 2. f90 3 367
l .. d ' . " io". ' "" d ~il~~:rof' to � 368
5 .. "'}�i"' in �,.. ~ tw' ... :!ls~:! ~ rc~t :on1t:~r..t 1� ~ ~� diilB 0 due a~t t i .~ i:i~c.l . ec.c .tl;:'l ... "l!.r� l.,.li .. .. . .., 11:1 on. :t~l ill ~)$ O!iHl,. n )CJ ar ,i'f " ~. ~ .1 .o .. ' � 1. ' t 3 69
). ' "' 0 ..1. ~ t" ..l ,.. ,,. .' .. ~ ,t_ '� �- t, �' �'<.; 1 --~ II lL t .. ... �, v J.- n. . 37 o.
'I 1~ . . l..Qt{) I, no ... f ....in.t;. w s p:rat t a l ..o-..:r t t .0.. ' 371
- ~ id ., t:: ... !' .. .. I 37 2
More in CTA Decisions
- UPSI MANAGEMENT, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 544)
- CTA Case No. 4866 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4866)
- CTA Case No. 4360 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4360)
- TYCO INFORMATION SOLUTIONS CORP. v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8592)
- PMAC BUSINESS OPERATIONS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10391)
- M+W PHILIPPINES INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1056)
- BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9478)
- EBAR ABSTRACTING COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10685)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.