[ G. R. No. 36195. May 26, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 36195. May 26, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 36195
[ G. R. No. 36195. May 26, 1934 ]
SIXTO BAILON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS ET AL., OPPOSITORS, THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________20th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________recover from the _____________the appellant_________the sum of ________P40.00_________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 22021. August 07, 1924 ](G.R. No. 22021)
- [ G.R. No. 181235. July 22, 2009 ](611 Phil. 90)
- [ G.R. No. 79827. July 31, 1989 ](256 Phil. 1174)
- [ G.R. No. 181858. November 24, 2010 ](650 Phil. 525; 107 OG No. 39, 4827 (September 26, 2011))
- G.R. NO. 170234, February 08, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 218130. February 14, 2018 ](826 Phil. 102; 114 OG No. 47, 7836 (November 19, 2018))
- [ Adm. Case No. 5542. July 20, 2006 ](528 Phil. 1)
- [ G.R. Nos. 145339-42. November 26, 2002 ](441 Phil. 193)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.