ASTROBAG MANUFACTURING CORP., represented herein by ROCHELLE PAREDES DY ANG v. COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS and DISTRICT COLLECTOR - MANILA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER PORT
CTA Form No. 8 (For DCC) llllllllllll llllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllll llll 26-000 I03-0009 REPUBLIC OF THE PIDLIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION CTA CASE NO. 12351 ASTROBAG MANUFACTURING CORP., as represented herein by ROCHELLEPAREDESDYANG Petitioner, -versus- NOTICE OF RESOLUTION COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS and DISTRICT COLLECTOR - MANILA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER PORT, Respondents. To: THE LAW OFFICE OF LEQUIN AND MERCADO Units 1014 Corporate 145 Building 145 Mother Ignacia Avenue, South Triangle Quezon City GREETINGS: You are hereby notified by these presents that on June 22, 2026, a Resolution was rendered in the above-entitled case, copy of which is attached hereto. Quezon City, Philippines, June 29, 2026. . Ringpis rk of Court II
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OFTAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION ASTROBAG CTA Case No.12351 MANUFACTURING CORP., as represented Members: herein by ROCHELLE PAREDES DY ANG, RINGPIS-LIBAN, PJ, Chairperson, REYES-FAJARDO, and Petitioner, ANGELES, ]]. -versus- COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS and DISTRICT COLLECTOR - MANILA INTERNATIONAL Promulgated: CONTAINER PORT, Respondents. RESOLUTION First. Petitioner's Manifestation filed on April 24, 2026, relaying that it re-executed and properly notarized the Secretary's Certificate appended in its Petition for Review, is NOTED, and deemed SUFFICIENT compliance with Minute Resolution dated March 18, 2026. Second. Considering petitioner's Notice of Dismissal likewise filed on April 24, 2026, respondent's non-filing of Answer to the Petition, and by authority of Section 1,1 Rule 17 of the Rules of Court, Sectio n 1. Dismissal upo11 11otice by plni11 tiff - A complaint may be dis missed b y the plaintiff by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service of the answer or of a motion for summary judgment. Upon such notice being filed, the court shall issue an order confirming the dismissal. Unless otherwise stated in the notice, the dismissal is
RESOLUTION CTA Case No. 12351 Page 2 of2 as amended, the DISMISSAL of CTA Case No. 12351, at the instance of petitioner, is CONFIRMED. SO ORDERED. ~-~J-- MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Presiding Justice ~~f.~ -r-~fP\~ MARIAN I�* F. REYES-FAfARDO Associate Justice 1/JL HENRY S. ANGELES Associate Justice without prejudice, except that a notice operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in a competent court an action based on or including the same claim. (Boldfacing ours)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.