[ G. R. No. 37663. June 25, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37663. June 25, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37663
[ G. R. No. 37663. June 25, 1934 ]
DAMIAN MORCOSO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. DIEGO ALERIES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________9th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Antique________, dated the __________14th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________appellee__________ from the __________appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 196890. January 11, 2018 ](823 Phil. 534; 114 OG No. 41, 7029 (October 8, 2018))
- [ G.R. No. 243765. January 05, 2022 ](919 Phil. 146)
- G.R. No. 180597, November 07, 2008
- [ G.R. No. L-23510. May 30, 1966 ]
- [ G.R. No. 35237. April 05, 1932 ](G.R. No. 35237)
- [ G.R. No. 129887. February 17, 2000 ](382 Phil. 661)
- [ G.R. No. 227049. September 16, 2020 ](885 Phil. 288)
- G.R. No. 103922, July 09, 1996
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.